On Mar 4, 2018, at 1:43 PM, John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > [...] I think that you have some reason that you haven't stated for your preference here, John. It might be worth stopping for a moment and trying to feel your way into what is actually motivating you to continue arguing here. You have not said anything that in any way suggests to me that there is a problem with the policy. I literally do not see any reason, based on what you are saying here, for you to object to the policy. If you think you have stated such a reason, you have done so in such a subtle way that I can't find it.
