Wrt to labelling, i would simply start with a simple guideline manual that the venue has to pass on to the chef sufficiently before the event, and that manual would include instructions for mandatory food labels to be placed in front of the food offered. And the venue would have to acknowledge compliance to the requested procedures in a timely manner before the event so that one round of mitigation talks can happen before the event. Could even include templates to print for such labels. And then these templates would contain the claims Food choice 1 Template: [ Name field, eg: (Rice / potatoes) ] vegan/vegetarian/gluten-free/nut-free/ halal/kosher/... Just have a set of possible templates for the differnt key categories of food and then you can start also efining for different request food servings which categories of food must be provided. Maybe i am underthinking it, but this doesn't sound loke rocket science to me. Cheers Toerless On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 04:07:53PM +0000, Anton Ivanov wrote: > > >I have not done a scientific comparison with other conferences, i wold > >doubt they fare any better than IETF given the same amount of financing. > >Do you have concrete evidence (same price, better results )? > > They are not. > > I was at one of the receptions run during MWC last week and the food > was not labeled and mixed in a way which would preclude an allergic > person from taking a risk with it. > > However, I bet that it is the same as with IETF. > > Whoever organized it did not ask for it to be. As far as compliance > to the relevant law, Spain is towards the top of the Eu rankings so > they can do it. Simply, nobody bothered asking them to do it. > > A -- --- tte@xxxxxxxxx
