Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "tom p." <daedulus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Matthew Kerwin <matthew@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@xxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 10:01:55 +0200
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <007701d33761$8c0a0a60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
References: <09b0ed8b-c47a-83c3-9174-cce990bdb145@rfc-editor.org> <c76510f0-bf03-1393-9b35-082439cf466b@nostrum.com> <CA+9kkMDRfr4Vge5VGArdhq2wEioa4BizdGLOvjObBtn3XZEuhg@mail.gmail.com> <c846d071-c2f0-c5c3-d7de-e246b79e7cca@nostrum.com> <C38DD5C1-4B67-4C22-9BF8-FBC67AD1B90E@fugue.com> <51d7731c-caf0-c3d1-1f94-8095ea62bed0@nostrum.com> <1818E75B-86D4-4B90-A2A6-D0CD128034A0@fugue.com> <d0f9ce6a-b7ba-6205-c542-3f07c4e56b49@nostrum.com> <65BDB20CE6CCE5E7F4B40252@PSB> <15a84eff-57df-f4ad-96e3-c6c3cd8b133f@gmx.de> <A3DA53FD-3DBF-4B89-918C-A55DC7715FF1@tzi.org> <bf0323cc-f1e9-9f32-ac0d-fe59c9c51721@gmx.de> <599A5DC9-03B4-4234-9824-E0A337D9F871@tzi.org> <cd19b902-dde8-a3fb-132c-27eccdc66a26@gmx.de> <2C5631A0-60B4-4C62-9E74-CAA2A091D75C@tzi.org> <012701d336ea$7b1817a0$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net> <9d5162c1-c73f-7aac-5b5a-2289ecb793be@gmail.com> <CACweHNDx4nAkFC3oVtCcYgH9eEp+gP0MRbOyx2fEvHfmaCFf-A@mai l.gmail.com> <007701d33761$8c0a0a60$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0

On 2017-09-27 09:22, tom p. wrote:

...
I always use FTP to download RFC because it  (or at least my version
thereof) preserves the metadata whereas my HTTP client (Internet
Explorer) always mangles it.
...


Exactly what does it mangle?

Best regards, Julian

Follow-Ups:
- Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  - From: tom p.

References:
- RFC Series publishes first RFC with non-ASCII characters
  - From: Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Adam Roach
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Ted Hardie
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Adam Roach
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Ted Lemon
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Adam Roach
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Ted Lemon
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Adam Roach
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Julian Reschke
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: Carsten Bormann
- Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?
  - From: tom p.
- So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  - From: Brian E Carpenter
- Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
  - From: tom p.

Prev by Date: Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Next by Date: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-rtgwg-uloop-delay-06.txt> (Micro-loop prevention by introducing a local convergence delay) to Proposed Standard
Previous by thread: Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Next by thread: Re: So do both [was Re: Should the IETF be condoning, even promoting, BOM pollution?]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]