On 01/04/2014 01:33 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > If you think it would be a serious problem if the text is interpreted as > in the paraphrase above, then I think revisions to the actual text are > in order, because if there is any difference between the actual text and > the paraphrase, I find it hard to impossible to make out. It is not fine > to keep the text as-is if it is easy to misinterpret. I welcome honest attempts to improve the text. Lloyd's was not that. Feel free to propose better text, I'll be happy to see that. S. >