Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Scott> Is there something in that that you disagree with?

The issue isn't whether I agree or disagree with it, it's whether the IETF
should be making this foray into politics.  

Scott> Ignore statements that you know are just wrong unless they come from
Scott> those behind the draft,

That would only make sense if the draft were presented as an
individual-stream draft that represents only the authors' opinions, but does
not impact IETF process.

Ted> The point of the IETF stating a position on this is not to give ADs
Ted> another thing they can hassle document authors about.

One has to look at the likely impact of the draft, not merely at the
intentions of the authors.  
















[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]