Re: Last Call: <draft-farrell-perpass-attack-02.txt> (Pervasive Monitoring is an Attack) to Best Current Practice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 1/3/14 8:33 AM, Eric Rosen wrote:
> One has to look at the likely impact of the draft, not merely at the
> intentions of the authors.  

I don't know if I'd use "likely" here but I definitely think
the IETF should be somewhat more thoughtful about "possible."

I've been trying to figure out if there's a way forward that
doesn't involve bulldozing the dissenters.  Personally, I'd be
fine with publishing it as informational or experimental, or
if the document provided a lot more clarity about the basis for
review (along the lines of 3552).

Melinda





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]