I have been wondering whether a simple update to "A Guide to Writing A Security Considerations Section" is all that is needed to address the problem in hand? Stewart Sent from my iPad > On 3 Jan 2014, at 19:00, "Melinda Shore" <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On 1/3/14 8:33 AM, Eric Rosen wrote: >> One has to look at the likely impact of the draft, not merely at the >> intentions of the authors. > > I don't know if I'd use "likely" here but I definitely think > the IETF should be somewhat more thoughtful about "possible." > > I've been trying to figure out if there's a way forward that > doesn't involve bulldozing the dissenters. Personally, I'd be > fine with publishing it as informational or experimental, or > if the document provided a lot more clarity about the basis for > review (along the lines of 3552). > > Melinda >