Hi, yes, we are monitoring this effort. The reason why it has not been chartered yet is a lack of cycles in the main proponents, who are fairly busy contributing to other aspects of RTCWeb (among other things). Richard is the responsible AD for this effort. Cheers, Gonzalo On 04/12/2013 11:14 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: > On 12/2/13 10:15 AM, Mary Barnes wrote: >> We had a videocodec bof @IETF-85 and the WG just never got >> chartered: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/BofIETF85. >> Perhaps the ADs can fill in the gap as to why that didn't happen >> as I'm not sure whether a ball was dropped or there was a reason >> not to charter. > > Yes, it would be helpful to hear from the ADs about that. > > Peter > >