Re: Daughter of CODEC (was Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 12/2/13 10:15 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
> We had a videocodec bof  @IETF-85 and the WG just never got
> chartered: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/BofIETF85.
> Perhaps the ADs can fill in the gap as to why that didn't happen as
> I'm not sure whether a ball was dropped or there was a reason not
> to charter.

Yes, it would be helpful to hear from the ADs about that.

Peter

- -- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.19 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=4Bd9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]