On 11/30/13 4:45 AM, Roger Jørgensen wrote: > And if the problem is that bad, that it's impossible to reach > consensus in the WG, what about replacing the chairs? ... Not for failure to gain consensus, by any means. "No consensus, do nothing" is a legitimate (if frustrating) outcome. I think they showed really questionable judgment in calling for a vote and laying out eligibility criteria, and for me that's a huge issue (congratulations, guys - just like that you changed us into a member organization) but failure to gain consensus is a valid outcome. Melinda