On Nov 30, 2013 7:55 AM, "Melinda Shore" <melinda.shore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 11/30/13 4:45 AM, Roger Jørgensen wrote:
> > And if the problem is that bad, that it's impossible to reach
> > consensus in the WG, what about replacing the chairs? ...
>
> Not for failure to gain consensus, by any means. "No consensus,
> do nothing" is a legitimate (if frustrating) outcome. I think
> they showed really questionable judgment in calling for a vote
> and laying out eligibility criteria, and for me that's a huge issue
> (congratulations, guys - just like that you changed us into a
> member organization) but failure to gain consensus is a valid
> outcome.
>
> Melinda
>
+1 that no consensus means no MTI. Because of IPR restrictions, we cant have nice things.
Regarding voting, I am a voting member, what are the rules of conduct? May I sell my vote? EBay?