Re: Daughter of CODEC (was Re: Alternative decision process in RTCWeb)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gonzalo has captured this accurately.  We have been keeping in touch with the folks that had been driving things, back at the BoF stage.  Currently, my understanding is that things are in a holding pattern.  

Of course, if there's someone else who wants to take the lead on moving a charter forward (and probably having a second BoF), please feel free to contact Gonzalo or me. 

--Richard


On Wednesday, December 4, 2013, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Hi,

yes, we are monitoring this effort. The reason why it has not been
chartered yet is a lack of cycles in the main proponents, who are
fairly busy contributing to other aspects of RTCWeb (among other
things). Richard is the responsible AD for this effort.

Cheers,

Gonzalo


On 04/12/2013 11:14 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> On 12/2/13 10:15 AM, Mary Barnes wrote:
>> We had a videocodec bof  @IETF-85 and the WG just never got
>> chartered: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/BofIETF85.
>> Perhaps the ADs can fill in the gap as to why that didn't happen
>> as I'm not sure whether a ball was dropped or there was a reason
>> not to charter.
>
> Yes, it would be helpful to hear from the ADs about that.
>
> Peter
>
>


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]