On 2013-10-21 18:14, Benoit Claise wrote:
<snip>
Personallly, I'd encourage authors to not add ADs unless there's
a specific reason. Within an IETF context, ADs get enough ego
boosting already.
Agreed.
Sigh, while I think most the folks speaking up here agree to that,
it seems almost impossible to get the other side of this through.
Mentioning ADs/WG chairs are not only to give them credit for a
particular document that has been published as an RFC.
It is also easily find whom you need to hold accountable, a couple of
ADs and a few IESG generations later.
his is why I'm reluctant to place this in the Ack section, and prefer
some place similar (read "new section".
/Loa
S.
--
Loa Andersson email: loa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Senior MPLS Expert loa@xxxxx
Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64