Re: draft-moonesamy-ietf-conduct-3184bis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 9/3/13 6:50 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think that is a given without having pre-emptive blame assignment in the text.

*Blame*?

I know that I've inadvertently used regional idioms that were hard
for non-native speakers to understand and I've been grateful when
it's been pointed out.  Trying to figure out where things get confusing
and correcting that is a net positive for the organization.
Characterizing that process as "blame" is not.

We're supposed to be engineers.  Let's fix stuff.

Melinda





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]