On 08/31/2013 09:52 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
Lars Eggert made the following comment:
"I actually WANT this draft to talk about the CONSEQUENCES (posting
rights
getting taken away, personal attendance made impossible, etc.) of not
following the code of conduct! I think that would be by FAR the most
impactful addition we could make."
Some of the above is already possible (see Appendix B).
Just one point that irks me a bit about this draft... this draft would
imply the violation of the code upon those who do (however
inadvertently) are 1) Native English speakers and 2) use slang of some
nature (which is quite arbitrary). I'd ask for the original phrasing to
be more or less preserved (I see a few wording changes worthwhile) to
avoid the implied absurdity.
The application of Lars' comment would potentially provide for penalty
here, so I think it is worthwhile to fight this point now.
I promise I'll try not to use my generally unintelligible speech.
--WM