Re: Remote participants access to Meeting Mailing Lists was Re: BOF posters in the welcome reception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 25/07/13 05:27, Moriarty, Kathleen wrote:
I like Aaron's suggestion to update the web with important information about a meeting.  There is a lot of mail on the list and that could be a useful way to communicate updates, etc.

Thanks, in case the previous mail is down in the pile already...

"
One thing that may also benefit both Remote and Meeting participants:

An anchor point to distribute live update about IETF week, e.g., schedule change, latest bits-n-bytes info, WG/BoF agenda changes/slides uploaded(with embedded link), highlight/awards at plenary, emergent notice for facility issues/weather/traffic/hotel stealing...

Most of those could be found if digging hard enough from hundreds of mails during IETF week, but a quick link definitely helps.

It can be a "live update" bullet on the front page of IETF meeting
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/87/
"

Cheers,
Aaron


Best regards,
Kathleen

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 12:12 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 25/07/2013 11:27, Scott Brim wrote:
Brian: yes but non-registered thus non-ifentifiable subscribers, spammers
etc don't.
We're talking about a list with a useful lifetime of perhaps 3 weeks.
I really don't think spam is a big issue. Trolls might be, but they
would be *our* trolls ;-)

Anyway - as John Klensin said, we should come up with a reasonably
complete and welcoming set of info and facilities for the remotes.
That may well include pro forma registration.

    Brian

On Jul 24, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On 25/07/2013 05:01, Scott Brim wrote:
The point of having a separate list for participants was to avoid
spamming the ietf list.

It can be open to everyone to subscribe to, since anyone can see the
archives, HOWEVER I recommend that only registered participants be
allowed to post.
Ahem. Either remote participants are allowed to post, or they need
a list of their own. I would envisage a fair amount of chatter about
specific remote-participation issues, like "this new codec isn't
working for me, is it OK for anyone else using <browser version> on
<operating system version>?"

  Brian





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]