--On Wednesday, July 24, 2013 17:46 +0100 Tim Chown <tjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I see no reason why the 87attendees@xxxxxxxx list shouldn't be > open to remote participants. Is that not the case already? We > should be doing all we can to encourage participation. It is already. It is a bit hard to find, but it is there and open. >... Unfortunately 87all@xxxxxxxx --the "announce" version of the list-- is where the really important things, like schedule changes, show up. And, at least as far as I can tell, there is no way for a non-registrant to get on that list. >... best, john