Re: Remote participants access to Meeting Mailing Lists was Re: BOF posters in the welcome reception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I like Aaron's suggestion to update the web with important information about a meeting.  There is a lot of mail on the list and that could be a useful way to communicate updates, etc.

Best regards,
Kathleen 

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 25, 2013, at 12:12 AM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 25/07/2013 11:27, Scott Brim wrote:
>> Brian: yes but non-registered thus non-ifentifiable subscribers, spammers
>> etc don't.
> 
> We're talking about a list with a useful lifetime of perhaps 3 weeks.
> I really don't think spam is a big issue. Trolls might be, but they
> would be *our* trolls ;-)
> 
> Anyway - as John Klensin said, we should come up with a reasonably
> complete and welcoming set of info and facilities for the remotes.
> That may well include pro forma registration.
> 
>    Brian
> 
>> On Jul 24, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 25/07/2013 05:01, Scott Brim wrote:
>>>> The point of having a separate list for participants was to avoid
>>>> spamming the ietf list.
>>>> 
>>>> It can be open to everyone to subscribe to, since anyone can see the
>>>> archives, HOWEVER I recommend that only registered participants be
>>>> allowed to post.
>>> Ahem. Either remote participants are allowed to post, or they need
>>> a list of their own. I would envisage a fair amount of chatter about
>>> specific remote-participation issues, like "this new codec isn't
>>> working for me, is it OK for anyone else using <browser version> on
>>> <operating system version>?"
>>> 
>>>  Brian
> 





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]