On 25/07/2013 11:27, Scott Brim wrote:
> Brian: yes but non-registered thus non-ifentifiable subscribers, spammers
> etc don't.
We're talking about a list with a useful lifetime of perhaps 3 weeks.
I really don't think spam is a big issue. Trolls might be, but they
would be *our* trolls ;-)
Anyway - as John Klensin said, we should come up with a reasonably
complete and welcoming set of info and facilities for the remotes.
That may well include pro forma registration.
Brian
> On Jul 24, 2013 3:56 PM, "Brian E Carpenter" <brian.e.carpenter@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> On 25/07/2013 05:01, Scott Brim wrote:
>>> The point of having a separate list for participants was to avoid
>>> spamming the ietf list.
>>>
>>> It can be open to everyone to subscribe to, since anyone can see the
>>> archives, HOWEVER I recommend that only registered participants be
>>> allowed to post.
>> Ahem. Either remote participants are allowed to post, or they need
>> a list of their own. I would envisage a fair amount of chatter about
>> specific remote-participation issues, like "this new codec isn't
>> working for me, is it OK for anyone else using <browser version> on
>> <operating system version>?"
>>
>> Brian
>>
>