Re: voting system for future venues?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 24, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:

> 
> 
> On 08/24/2011 11:43 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
>> 
>> On Aug 24, 2011, at 3:24 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>>> Inflation is accounted for in the figures given. We're
>>> still>20% above inflation in terms of hotel prices based
>>> on these figures.
>>> 
>>> You might claim hotel price inflation is higher than the
>>> overall, I don't know. I would hope the iaoc would know
>>> that. What I'm claiming is that the numbers seem to me
>>> to show that the outcome is not so good. And hence it seems
>>> to me that the iaoc is not performing that well in this respect.
>>> 
>>> You might bring out the meeting fee argument etc. but I
>>> think you (the iaoc as a group) should start by acknowledging
>>> that there is a real issue here and then try to address
>>> that and *not* argue I'm accusing you of bad faith or
>>> something.
>> 
>> Does not control for currency fluctuation unless I missed something in the table.
>> 
>> not that externalities such as the ECB members flushing the euro down the toilet don't impact costs but the notion that we can anticipate or ameliorate such risks on a 2-5 year time scale is unlikely.
> 
> Not that sure what your point is. If there's a fair way to
> arrange the actual data that shows costs not increasing
> faster than inflation I'd be interested in seeing that.
> I don't believe there is.
> 
> While I'm sure there are details of the table I made
> up that can be debated, I'd rather the iaoc do that work
> and then
> 
> My point is that for what I've been able to easily measure
> it looks to me like the iaoc haven't got great results.

and what I'm saying is the current venue is 10% more expensive now then when negotiated.

so is your deviation 10% 20% etc.

is the ioac on the hook for the value of the us dollar?


> Also, I don't see that they're actually concentrating on
> reducing costs in a way that can be measured. And I think
> they should.
> 
> S.
> 

_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]