Re: Let's move on - Let's DNSCurve Re: DNSSEC is NOT secure end to end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:

> Past history is a very bad guarantee that problems will not arise in the future.

So, you mean your statement:

: Trust roots have to be valid for at least a decade to be acceptable to
: the application vendor community.

hardly guarantee anything.

> Be liberal in anticipating repeat of past problems,

Indeed.

Unnoticeable cache poisoning by glues is repeated even with
bailiwick and once again with DNSSEC.

> be conservative in
> your expectation that new problems will not arise.

The protection is to make protocols as simple as possible.

The following paper discusses about it to some extent.

http://ftp.csci.csusb.edu/ykarant/courses/f2007/csci530/papers/counterpane-ipsec.pdf

						Masataka Ohta

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]