Re: Let's move on - Let's DNSCurve Re: DNSSEC is NOT secure end to end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Past history is no guarantee of future performance.

A pattern we see repeated over and over again is that a new control on
some form of Internet crime leads to a dramatic short term reduction
even though the control merely increases the cost of crime, not
eliminates the capability. This is the displacement effect. The
criminals attack weaker targets instead. Once the criminals have
exhausted the supply of easy targets the original targets see a sudden
increase in the crime rate, often orders of magnitude in a few days.


On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Masataka
Ohta<mohta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
>
>> These are assertions, not facts.
>
> The fact is that since 1987, DNS has been mostly secure.
>
>> that is what it is designed to do and that is how I define the
>> term 'security'.
>
> You did not simply say "security" but said "cryptographic security".
>
>                                                Masataka Ohta
>
>



-- 
-- 
New Website: http://hallambaker.com/
View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week,
http://quantumofstupid.com/
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]