Re: Perks for chairs (Re: Making meeting attendance more affordable)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Really unrelated, but if need be, i'll claim it to be a perk (recognition):

Could datatracker please start to capture and show also past IETF roles of participants on their
people page ? Past chair , secretary, nomcom, othrer roles, ... etc.
With start/end dates.

(and no, i don't accept "do it yourself in the bio field" as an acceptable resolution.
 after all, we also have th counter discussion of too much accumulation of roles for
 few participants and lacking diversity therefore, and that would be good reason for folks
 not to try to highlight all their roles in their bio field themselves)

Cheers
    Toerless


On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 04:35:40PM +0200, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On 2023-07-27, at 19:15, Marie-Jose Montpetit <marie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > I think that chairs by default should be given free registration. We spend countless hours on IETF/IRTF issues. 
> 
> At first blush, I'd think so, too (of course :-)
> 
> But seriously, I wouldn’t want the deliberation of “who would make the best chairs” to be overlaid by the thought “who needs that support most to be able to participate”.
> 
> Oh, and WG/RG document authors need free registration too (of course :-).  
> (“Whose document should we adopt so the authors can continue to participate.”)
> Maybe only the first author.
> (“Do we need to split this WG/RG document so another one of the authors can be first on the other one and continue to participate.”)
> 
> You see where I think this leads...
> 
> Grüße, Carsten

-- 
---
tte@xxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux