On 10/28/2022 10:14 AM, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
On 10/28/2022 8:18 AM EDT Kevin A. McGrail
<kevin.mcgrail-ietf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/27/2022 5:23 PM, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote:
Copyrights should be respected, even the ones that aren't convenient.
There are plenty of times copyrights are respected without legalese and
administrivia. This definitely sounds like one of those.
Has the actual copyright holder complained or asked for any changes?
I'm very confused who is asking for an entire RFC to be removed.
-KAM
I think I understand. You're saying that it's OK to infringe on copyrights if nobody complains. To me that sounds like a bad standard for standards.
Tim,
If you are going to put words in my mouth, I would say, "don't make a
mountain out of a mole hill.". Is the copyright holder asking for
changes? Everyone knows when they write RFCs they are being published.
The dotting i's for copyright releases is MINOR. Pulling an entire RFC
is MAJOR.
Are you the copyright holder? Are you even aware of any harm or
confusion from this issue?
Regards,
KAM
