> On 10/27/2022 2:44 PM EDT Pete Resnick <resnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 27 Oct 2022, at 13:31, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote: > > > Rfc8958 does not include the required language to conform to the > > copyright and receive permissions its claims have been granted. > > Incorrect. > > > Rfc3405 copyright says: > > "...provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are > > included on all such copies and derivative works. ". > > That is selective editing. It says that you can copy, furnish to others, > make derivative works, etc., *without restriction* provided that the > copyright notice, etc. is included. However, the next sentence says that > you can't remove the notice, etc., "except as needed for the purpose of > developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for > copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be followed." > > RFC 8958 followed the correct process. > Pete, haha, Pete. Good place for you to put the 'etc'. But I'm afraid you are wrong on this one. Here is a good test. See if you can find that whole paragraph, or even the words 'This document and translations', anywhere in RFC8958. If you can not, then its a no go. Copyrights should be respected, even the ones that aren't convenient.
