This is a tiresome thread and I’m embarrassed to be adding to it, and yet I am. According to the webpage at URL: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/copyright-infringement.asp The U.S. Copyright Office defines copyright infringement as such: "As a general matter, copyright infringement occurs when a copyrighted work is reproduced, distributed, performed, publicly displayed, or made into a derivative work without the permission of the copyright owner." Timothy, what infringements occurred without the permission of the copyright owner are you concerned about? -----Original Message----- > On 10/28/2022 8:18 AM EDT Kevin A. McGrail <kevin.mcgrail-ietf@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 10/27/2022 5:23 PM, Timothy Mcsweeney wrote: > > Copyrights should be respected, even the ones that aren't convenient. > > There are plenty of times copyrights are respected without legalese > and administrivia. This definitely sounds like one of those. > > Has the actual copyright holder complained or asked for any changes? > I'm very confused who is asking for an entire RFC to be removed. > > -KAM I think I understand. You're saying that it's OK to infringe on copyrights if nobody complains. To me that sounds like a bad standard for standards. |
