Re: [Manycouches] Think outside the box - Re: Want to be on the IESG?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In my experience, criticism of others for "not thinking/acting outside of the box" is often shorthand for "thinking/acting that doesn’t agree with mine" rather than any indicator of a systemic problem.  I think it fairer to assume that others have done just as much thinking as me, but come to a different conclusion.

Jay 

> On 14/10/2021, at 4:49 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Stephen. I guess i was referring to 
> "act outside the box" and not only "think outside the box".
> And i do think it may be easier to do that when you actually
> do come from outside the box.
> 
> Cheers
>    Toerless
> 
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2021 at 04:27:59PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> 
>> On 13/10/2021 15:54, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>>> manycouches had many couch potatoes arguing for many many years to
>>> have at least one virtual-only IETF per year, even if just as an
>>> experiment. I do not remember a single AD thinking outside of a box
>>> to push for such an experiment.
>> 
>> I don't think that's accurate. It's fair to say that
>> we didn't make real progress on attempting to only
>> meet twice in any year before covid, but there were
>> a bunch of ADs among those considering the issues,
>> (incl. me back then.) Just because the IESG doesn't
>> manage to succeed in figuring stuff out does not mean
>> that the IESG didn't try so I'd cut the current leadership
>> some slack before accusing them of being unable to
>> think outside whatever boxes are perceived to exist.
>> 
>> S.
> 

-- 
Jay Daley
IETF Executive Director
exec-director@xxxxxxxx





[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux