Re: [Last-Call] Last Call: Advancing the Registration Data Access Protocol (RDAP) to Internet Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I have made the change:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-rdap-to-internet-standard/

Barry

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 6:21 PM Barry Leiba <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Indeed; just checking what you had in mind   I’ll make the change soon.
>
> b
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 6:19 PM John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I was assuming both.  Yours talks about Whois and its
>> replacement; Scott's push a much more solid foundation under why
>> it is sensible to move ahead with RDAP.
>>
>>     john
>>
>>
>> --On Friday, February 19, 2021 17:15 -0500 Barry Leiba
>> <barryleiba@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > Do you want my paragraph also, or just Scott's?
>> >
>> > Barry
>> >
>> > On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 4:16 PM John C Klensin
>> > <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Scott,
>> >>
>> >> That is precisely the sort of statement / additional
>> >> sentences I was looking for.  Thanks.
>> >>
>> >> Barry, if you could add Scott's paragraph, I think all of the
>> >> requirements (as well as my personal aesthetic sense) would be
>> >> satisfied and we would avoid setting any precedents of moving
>> >> documents to Internet Standard with handwaving, rather than
>> >> specifics, about deployment.
>> >>
>> >> thanks again,
>> >>     john
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --On Friday, February 19, 2021 20:45 +0000 "Hollenbeck, Scott"
>> >> <shollenbeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> For example, if it is in wide use in the address
>> >> >> registries, let's say that.  If it is the actual back end
>> >> >> for the web-based interfaces for a significant number of
>> >> >> TLD registries, let's say that (even if you have to weight
>> >> >> "number of TLD registries by
>> >> >> number of registrants to make that true)?   If, when I use
>> >> >> the Whois protocol to access information in those registry
>> >> >> databases, I'm really using a front-end shim over RDAP, say
>> >> >> that too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I suspect all of those things may be true but, again, I
>> >> >> don't have the data.   Scott and Andy certainly should (in
>> >> >> a more ideal world, the information would even be in the
>> >> >> implementation report0, so this should be matter or a
>> >> >> sentence or three, not a research project.
>> >> >
>> >> > [SAH] A proposal for a few more sentences:
>> >> >
>> >> > RDAP is fully deployed and operational at all five Regional
>> >> > Address Registries. RDAP implementation and operation is a
>> >> > contractual requirement for all ICANN-accredited domain name
>> >> > registries and 2,370 registrars. The IANA "Bootstrap Service
>> >> > Registry for Domain Name Space" describes 820 unique RDAP
>> >> > base URLs that are are associated with several thousand
>> >> > generic top-level and country code domain name RDAP servers
>> >> > that are operated by domain name registries.
>> >>
>>
>>

-- 
last-call mailing list
last-call@xxxxxxxx
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/last-call




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux