Re: USA dominion: Re: IESG Statement On Oppressive or Exclusionary Language

[lloyd.wood=40yahoo.co.uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Rich

I’m quite serious. I have stated this before, on this list, to an audience that you would think would care about this.

I cannot speak for others here.


Lloyd Wood

lloyd.wood@xxxxxxxx,uk

On Sunday, July 26, 2020, 00:09, Salz, Rich <rsalz=40akamai.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

• As I’ve stated previously on this list, I view “folks” as a trigger, as it imposes passive-aggressive patronising distancing, and it’s certainly not as inclusionary as you might think. A word best avoided, in my view.

 

This is an honest question: are you serious?  Are there others who feel this way?