Re: WG Review: Stay Home Meet Only Online (shmoo)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



See my RFC 4144, Section 2.
Also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_law_of_oligarchy

Thanks,
Donald
===============================
 Donald E. Eastlake 3rd   +1-508-333-2270 (cell)
 2386 Panoramic Circle, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
 d3e3e3@xxxxxxxxx

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 1:23 PM S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Spencer, Joe, Rich,
>
> The point which Spencer made [1] was that there isn't an IETF
> hierarchy.   I did a quick search on "IETF leadership" and there was
> a hit.  It is difficult to have an organization without any
> classification (or hierarchy).  As an example, there is a Chair at
> the working group level.
>
> I agree with Spencer that it would be good to have a broader
> conversation.  I agree with Joe's comment (and Rich) about the IETF
> RFC "editorial board".
>
> I don't know what is right [2].
>
> Regards,
> S. Moonesamy
>
> 1. I read both emails.  My response does not cover the points in the
> second one in what I consider as satisfactory.
>
> 2. Sorry for the short response.  I would have elaborated on this if
> it was easy for me to find the correct wording.
>




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux