On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 08:51 -0400, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Jun 11, 2013, at 3:37 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > here's what Adam sait about that " if ntfsresize fails for some reason, that wouldn't be a blocker." which kinda beats the purpose of the criteria right ( since no factory install of windows comes with available free space so the user always has to resize before or during the installation phaze ) > > Users installing Windows into a discrete space that's less than max > available is the minority case, but that doesn't obviate the need for > the criterion. Further, historically the part of the criterion that > causes hold ups is the boot loader aspect, not resizing problems. > > If the anaconda team really considers resizing inherently risky and > unpredictable, the operation needs to come with a warning to the user. > Insofar as I'm aware, there is no such warning, or suggestion of > alternatives: boot Windows and use its utility for resizing the file > system. Then an install into free space is also possible. I think the old anaconda did have a warning about resize operations. If newUI doesn't, then yeah, maybe it should. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- test mailing list test@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
