Re: Re: I wish to package some CC licensed content ...

[Lyos Gemini Norezel <lyos.gemininorezel@xxxxxxxxx>]

Nicolas Mailhot wrote:

Le vendredi 20 février 2009 à 13:14 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit :

  

I think Bill Nottingham really hit the nail on the head here with why 
content should be a separate repo. It's generally unlikely to be tied to 
a particular Fedora release, ergo putting it in a version-release repo 
would lead to a lot of unnecessary duplication.
    

Because our packaging guidelines do not ever change, and rpm has
fossilized, right?
  

Careful Nicolas... the dripping sarcasm isn't as noticeable in text as it would be in voice.

Lyos Gemini Norezel

begin:vcard
fn:Lyos Norezel
n:Norezel;Lyos
org:GBES, LLC
adr:;;;;Ohio;;United States
email;internet:Lyos.GeminiNorezel@xxxxxxxxx
title:Computer Repair Technician
note;quoted-printable:"Those who hunt monsters beware, lest they become monsters themselves.Ify=
	ou stare long into the abyss, the abyss stares back into you." --Nietzsch=
	e=0D=0A=
	=0D=0A=
	Mundus Vult Decipi et Decipiatur -- Latin Proverb
version:2.1
end:vcard

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging