Le vendredi 20 février 2009 à 13:14 -0600, Matthew Woehlke a écrit : > I think Bill Nottingham really hit the nail on the head here with why > content should be a separate repo. It's generally unlikely to be tied to > a particular Fedora release, ergo putting it in a version-release repo > would lead to a lot of unnecessary duplication. Because our packaging guidelines do not ever change, and rpm has fossilized, right? -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
