Re: Proposal: Rolling Release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 11.11.2008 22:42, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 15:23 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Which repos have a chance to rebuild against new fedora libraries before they are publicly available so a user updating with both enabled won't experience conflicts?
Every repo.  Our build roots are public and static repo locations are
updated hourly with their contents.  It's all public, anybody in the
would can access it.

As someone that takes care of a 3rd party repo I can mostly agree to this statement from Jesse. But there is one important thing that is not really foreseeable for the public: Pushes to the stable or testing updates repos.

They just happen suddenly out of the blue and I as 3rd party repo manager have no real chance to do push at exactly the same time. All a 3rd party repo manager can do is to watch fedora-announce-list closely and push packages that have dependencies on specific Fedora packages (xine-lib-extras-nonfree, qmmp-plugins-freeworld, all kmods, some others) once he sees that Fedora did the push.

That is one of the big problems. Another one: Dependency problems due to mirror lags afaik confuse yum (at least on F8 and F9). Details can be found here:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-August/msg00041.html

Thank you! That's exactly the point of view that needs to be emphasized here, both with respect to the people trying to cooperate with the fedora distribution and the users who are affected.

Every time I try to point out the need for 3rd party add-ons here, the discussion degenerates into useless rationalization as to why the entire universe can't live in the fedora repository. But it doesn't matter why. The fact is that it doesn't, never will, and it would be a bad idea for everyone to rely on a single source for their critical applications even if they could. We just need an understanding that people will always need additional software and they need it to not break when updates are pushed out - and if that can't be fixed, next best would be a way to back out the breakage or run old/new in parallel while fixing compatibility.

--
  Les Mikesell
    lesmikesell@gmail


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux