Re: Proposal: Rolling Release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Les Mikesell [11/11/2008 19:20] :
The problem is that Fedora does not admit that users need things that are not included in the box, does nothing to co-operate with others that would provide them, and by shipping a wildly moving target with no coordination, actively breaks everything others even attempt to do in this regard.

Fedora releases betas, snapshots and previews of a version of its
distribution before its release, as well as allowing anyone to run
Rawhide. Developement is done in the open and all mailing lists are
public.

Saying that Fedora "does nothing to co-operate with others" and ships "a
wildly moving target" is a straw man.

Which repos have a chance to rebuild against new fedora libraries before they are publicly available so a user updating with both enabled won't experience conflicts?

--
  Les Mikesell
   lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux