Re: Proposal: Rolling Release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 10:39 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Would you rather just pretend fedora is perfect, supplies everything
> all 
> users will ever need, and never ships a package with bugs that needs
> to 
> be backed out?  Or that no other approaches to these problems can be
> better?

Les, 

I hate to bring logic to a troll fight, but lets try to be objective
here.

If the problem is truly:

* Fedora does not provide non-free, legally encumbered applications out
of the box

Then, there is nothing that we can do to resolve this which does not:

* Compromise Fedora's position on only including Free Software
* Break US law (and yes, this includes not committing contributory
infringement)

These are the facts. Now, if you think you have a constructive
suggestion on how to solve the problem I stated above which doesn't
compromise Fedora's Free Software only position or break US law, speak
now. Otherwise, please drop this point.

~spot

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux