Re: Proposal: Rolling Release

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11.11.2008 22:42, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2008-11-11 at 15:23 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
Which repos have a chance to rebuild against new fedora libraries before they are publicly available so a user updating with both enabled won't experience conflicts?
Every repo.  Our build roots are public and static repo locations are
updated hourly with their contents.  It's all public, anybody in the
would can access it.

As someone that takes care of a 3rd party repo I can mostly agree to this statement from Jesse. But there is one important thing that is not really foreseeable for the public: Pushes to the stable or testing updates repos.

They just happen suddenly out of the blue and I as 3rd party repo manager have no real chance to do push at exactly the same time. All a 3rd party repo manager can do is to watch fedora-announce-list closely and push packages that have dependencies on specific Fedora packages (xine-lib-extras-nonfree, qmmp-plugins-freeworld, all kmods, some others) once he sees that Fedora did the push.

That is one of the big problems. Another one: Dependency problems due to mirror lags afaik confuse yum (at least on F8 and F9). Details can be found here:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2008-August/msg00041.html

CU
knurd

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux