On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 11:47:10PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: >Am Mittwoch, den 08.10.2008, 17:08 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer: >> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: >> >Am Mittwoch, den 08.10.2008, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer: >> >> The decision was made under the _fact_ that the Feature lacked packages >> >> that had not passed review. If they aren't all there, it can't be tested >> >> by Beta. It's really that simple. >> > >> >As I wrote in a previous mail: I don't challenge that, but for me it not >> >"really that simple" but "really that disappointing". I've put a lot of >> >work into the feature and when I see that people hardly seem to read the >> >feature page or don't care about informing the feature owner is just >> >disappointing. >> >> I'm in FESCo. I read the Feature page. > >Just curious: Why didn't you speak up then when somebody made an false >assumption? Because nobody in FESCo made that statement. Kevin had already said "for lxde, sadly 2 packages are still in review...". The rest of the discussion was pretty moot after that. > >> It was/is quite detailed. It >> still, unfortunately, doesn't meet the criteria of being a Feature. > >You mean in general or for Fedora 10? Oh, just for F10. >> Now, that doesn't mean your work is wasted. It doesn't mean that, >> assuming you get the missing packages into Fedora in time, LXDE won't >> be installable. It _will_ be. All you are missing is the publicity >> aspect of a Feature at that point. > >I don't care about publicity, I don't want people to pat me on my back >or to hug me. I want these packages in Fedora, because I want to satisfy >the LXDE users. That's all. Cool. Go forth and conquer! josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
