On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: >Am Mittwoch, den 08.10.2008, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer: >> On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 08:09:12PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: >> >> >So the decision was made under the assumption that _none_ of the LXDE >> >packages has ever passed a review. How can somebody who has read the >> >feature page claim that? Why did nobody answer him back? >> >> The decision was made under the _fact_ that the Feature lacked packages >> that had not passed review. If they aren't all there, it can't be tested >> by Beta. It's really that simple. > >As I wrote in a previous mail: I don't challenge that, but for me it not >"really that simple" but "really that disappointing". I've put a lot of >work into the feature and when I see that people hardly seem to read the >feature page or don't care about informing the feature owner is just >disappointing. I'm in FESCo. I read the Feature page. It was/is quite detailed. It still, unfortunately, doesn't meet the criteria of being a Feature. Now, that doesn't mean your work is wasted. It doesn't mean that, assuming you get the missing packages into Fedora in time, LXDE won't be installable. It _will_ be. All you are missing is the publicity aspect of a Feature at that point. Is that disappointing? Yeah, perhaps. But if you care enough (and you seem to), then self-promoting LXDE is always a valid option. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
