Kevin Kofler (kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx) said: > Bill Nottingham <notting <at> redhat.com> writes: > > There are descriptions which are translated as well.... > > Well, leave it blank, leave it in English (untranslated), put just a URL for > the upstream web page as the description ... or, actually follow the string freeze, and the string freeze break policy. > too, ... - anything is better than having a set of packages all packaged and > reviewed, but hidden from users (not listed in comps, and rejected as a feature > on the ground that it isn't in comps). I'm sorry, but I'm missing the outrage - the feature page listed the following things, under 'Scope': * Package Reviews (were not fully done) * Comps: new group with id "lxde-desktop", name "LXDE"... o mandatory: lxde-common, lxpanel, openbox, pcmanfm o default: gpicview, leafpad, lxappearance, lxtask, lxterminal, obconf, xarchiver ... (wasn't done) and, under 'Test Plan': As most of the packages are already in fedora they are proven to be stable. So we need to 1. get the 2 missing packages into rawhide ASAP so they are included in the F10 Beta 2. add packages to comps 3. test that installation with yum-groupinstall works correctly 4. test fresh installs with the beta It wasn't even to having step 1 completed. So, exactly what else is there to do when even the basic scope and test plan of the feature isn't ready? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
