Am Mittwoch, den 08.10.2008, 17:08 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 10:56:12PM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: > >Am Mittwoch, den 08.10.2008, 16:47 -0400 schrieb Josh Boyer: > >> The decision was made under the _fact_ that the Feature lacked packages > >> that had not passed review. If they aren't all there, it can't be tested > >> by Beta. It's really that simple. > > > >As I wrote in a previous mail: I don't challenge that, but for me it not > >"really that simple" but "really that disappointing". I've put a lot of > >work into the feature and when I see that people hardly seem to read the > >feature page or don't care about informing the feature owner is just > >disappointing. > > I'm in FESCo. I read the Feature page. Just curious: Why didn't you speak up then when somebody made an false assumption? > It was/is quite detailed. It > still, unfortunately, doesn't meet the criteria of being a Feature. You mean in general or for Fedora 10? > Now, that doesn't mean your work is wasted. It doesn't mean that, > assuming you get the missing packages into Fedora in time, LXDE won't > be installable. It _will_ be. All you are missing is the publicity > aspect of a Feature at that point. I don't care about publicity, I don't want people to pat me on my back or to hug me. I want these packages in Fedora, because I want to satisfy the LXDE users. That's all. > > Is that disappointing? Yeah, perhaps. But if you care enough (and > you seem to), then self-promoting LXDE is always a valid option. OK then, let's focus our efforts on the packages then (and forget about my first question, although I'd really like to know from somebody who attended the meeting) > > josh Regards, Christoph -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
