Re: Taking fedora-devel into consideration [Was: Re: tab completion less useful now, due to sbin in path]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-10-08, 19:31 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Did this email come from the past? Do we really want to talk 
> about upstart again?

Did you read my message? That was just another example of 
decision making which was kind of weird, IMHO.

> I'm sorry you're offended. We can't please everyone all the 
> time with every decision. If you don't like the decisions, feel 
> free to run for FESCo and/or vote/not vote for people who you 
> disagree with.

Actually, I really cannot care less about whether sysvinit is 
better than Upstart (or other way around) -- I am a desktop guy 
and whatever gets me to gdm is good enough for me.

I am interested only in the procedure -- after what seemed like 
a rare example of flamewar which led to some conclusion, FESCO 
seemed to decide just opposite.

Whatever, back to deduplicating ATI crashes ;-).

Matěj

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux