Matej Cepl wrote: > Actually, I really cannot care less about whether sysvinit is > better than Upstart (or other way around) -- I am a desktop guy > and whatever gets me to gdm is good enough for me. > I remember there was a flamewar but I don't remember all that was said or where it concluded. I do recall that Casey Dahlin decided we needed to write our own init replacement somewhere near the end of it. Then we had a FUDCon and Casey pitched a session on defining the feature set we wanted in a rewritten init. At that session, people decided that upstart either had all the features that had been mentioned or was actively working on adding them. After that, it was a matter of the people who cared about a new init system were doing the work to get upstart merged so FESCo approved that work as a feature. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
