On 2008-10-08, 22:54 GMT, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > I remember there was a flamewar but I don't remember all that > was said or where it concluded. I do recall that Casey Dahlin > decided we needed to write our own init replacement somewhere > near the end of it. Then we had a FUDCon and Casey pitched > a session on defining the feature set we wanted in a rewritten > init. At that session, people decided that upstart either had > all the features that had been mentioned or was actively > working on adding them. After that, it was a matter of the > people who cared about a new init system were doing the work to > get upstart merged so FESCo approved that work as a feature. OK, this is much better explanation that what I was afraid happened. Thanks a lot for giving me peace in this situation. Matěj -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
