Hi, On 4/13/22 23:11, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> If that proves acceptable for change owners here that would perhaps take >> care of the short term problem. What about longer term though? Would the >> thought be that the BIOS sig would remain around for the forseeable >> future maintaining BIOS boot? Or would there be some kind of roadmap to >> retirement? > > I think it would make sense for the group to be set up with with some sort > of "retirement becomes the default if the SIG stops being active" policy. I > mean, not as a surprise, but so the situation is clear. That is fair, although I hope that if the SIG runs out of steam for this, that at least it will still have enough life in it to send out a proper notice about BIOS boot support is really going away. Regards, Hans _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
