On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 07:20:52PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > We've got a 300+ message thread in just one week, with 66 different > participants. This handily beats discussions systemd-resolved, > btrfs-by-default, and even switching the default editor to nano. > > Clearly there's a lot to talk about here. Would it be useful to have a > high-bandwidth, moderated conversation via video call about the best path > forward? > > (Because of the number of likely participants, Jitsi probably won't cut it, > so this would likely be via Bluejeans.) > > It'll obviously be difficult to find a time where _everyone_ can > participate, so this wouldn't be a deciding-things meeting, rather a > "talking about possibilities and hopefully coming to more mutual > understanding" meeting. And I would make sure there are good notes.* > > > (* volunteers who are good at note taking welcome!) Here are some thread stats I took just now: Overall statistics ------------------ Total number of messages: 310 Number of messages that is a reply: 306 (98.71%) Total size: 4191268 Average size: 13520 Total number of writers: 78 Number of people who wrote >1 message: 37 (47.44%) Top writers | # msgs|av size| total|time | e-mail address ---+-------+-------+------+-----+-------------------------------- 1] 40| 14224|568978|13:24| neal gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> 2] 33| 11715|386622|13:30| devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 3] 31| 13173|408389|13:19| robbie harwood <rharwood@xxxxxxxxxx> 4] 29| 13091|379662|14:56| chris murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 5] 15| 21574|323617|14:26| jared dominguez <jaredz@xxxxxxxxxx> 6] 13| 11834|153851|13:37| dominik 'rathann' mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 7] 11| 19316|212484|17:23| demi marie obenour <demiobenour@xxxxxxxxx> 8] 8| 10816| 86533|12:56| chris adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> 9] 8| 16190|129527|11:26| "thomas schmitt" <scdbackup@xxxxxxx> 10] 8| 11985| 95880|07:52| gary buhrmaster <gary.buhrmaster@xxxxxxxxx> While the thread is busy, here are the top participants (with #2 excepted). The core issue still comes down to having resources to continue maintaining BIOS boot support in Fedora and so far no one has come forward to work on that. If a video call can come up with a community plan to do that, I would say it might be worth it. Otherwise it may just be a continuing of the thread as it is now. Thanks, -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
