On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:39:23AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13 2022 at 10:54:01 AM -0400, David Cantrell > <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The core issue still comes down to having resources to continue > > maintaining > > BIOS boot support in Fedora and so far no one has come forward to work > > on > > that. > > It's not true, although you can be forgiven for missing it in such a massive > thread. Hans proposed to start a BIOS SIG to handle this. This seems like a > very credible proposal. Ah, yes. I do remember the post from Hans, but thought he was more outlining how a Legacy BIOS SIG could work and what would need to happen rather than volunteering to set one up and do that. But I went back and reread that post and yes, he did volunteer to do just that. If a video call happens to discuss this feature proposal, ensure Hans can attend. Thanks, -- David Cantrell <dcantrell@xxxxxxxxxx> Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
