On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > If that proves acceptable for change owners here that would perhaps take > care of the short term problem. What about longer term though? Would the > thought be that the BIOS sig would remain around for the forseeable > future maintaining BIOS boot? Or would there be some kind of roadmap to > retirement? I think it would make sense for the group to be set up with with some sort of "retirement becomes the default if the SIG stops being active" policy. I mean, not as a surprise, but so the situation is clear. It'd be cool to see if we can make a bios-to-uefi thing like Clover work. That might be something interesting for the SIG to do. But, I don't think that's really a small project! -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
