Hans de Goede wrote: > As the Source0 provider for the packages and then next to: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2 > > Add a: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2-bios > > And moving the build of all sub-packages which are > only necessary for BIOS support to the second src.rpm. > > This way the Legacy BIOS SIG could maintain > the grub2-bios src.rpm (and binary pkgs it builds). Would it not make more sense to rename the locked down grub2 SRPM that will become UEFI only to grub2-efi and let grub2 be the BIOS one, to match the naming of the binary RPMs (which are already split)? Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
