On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 8:45 PM Kevin Kofler via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hans de Goede wrote: > > As the Source0 provider for the packages and then next to: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2 > > > > Add a: > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/grub2-bios > > > > And moving the build of all sub-packages which are > > only necessary for BIOS support to the second src.rpm. > > > > This way the Legacy BIOS SIG could maintain > > the grub2-bios src.rpm (and binary pkgs it builds). > > Would it not make more sense to rename the locked down grub2 SRPM that will > become UEFI only to grub2-efi and let grub2 be the BIOS one, to match the > naming of the binary RPMs (which are already split)? > The binary RPM for grub's BIOS boot code is grub2-pc (and grub2-pc-modules), not grub2. But "grub2-pc" is not particularly descriptive as a source package name, so grub2-bios makes sense for the source package name if we need to split it. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
